Identification and Decision Guide for Cypress Problems
go.ncsu.edu/readext?818310
en Español / em Português
El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.
Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.
Português
Inglês é o idioma de controle desta página. Na medida que haja algum conflito entre o texto original em Inglês e a tradução, o Inglês prevalece.
Ao clicar no link de tradução, um serviço gratuito de tradução será ativado para converter a página para o Português. Como em qualquer tradução pela internet, a conversão não é sensivel ao contexto e pode não ocorrer a tradução para o significado orginal. O serviço de Extensão da Carolina do Norte (NC State Extension) não garante a exatidão do texto traduzido. Por favor, observe que algumas funções ou serviços podem não funcionar como esperado após a tradução.
English
English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.
Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.
Collapse ▲Several species of “cypress”-type conifers (family Cupressaceae) are widely planted in North Carolina landscapes. Among the most common are arborvitae (Thuja spp.), Leyland cypress (xHesperotropsis leylandii), and Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica). These trees are sometimes used as specimen plants, but are often placed together in rows to form screens or yard barriers.
These trees are susceptible to numerous diseases, arthropod pests, and abiotic stressors, including those caused by human activity. They also undergo changes in appearance as they mature. This step-by-step guide will help you when dealing with these issues. In some cases it will lead you to a diagnosis; in others it will lead you to the conclusion that a physical and/or image sample needs to be submitted. For a table comparing the relative frequency of some problems on arborvitae, Leyland cypress, and junipers, see this table.
Step one:
Make sure you know what kind of tree you have. The guide below was designed with arborvitae, Leyland cypress, and Japanese cedar in mind. A few of the key differences are shown on this comparison page. Other similar plants, particularly Eastern redcedar and other members of the genus Juniperus, have a slightly different suite of problems and are not included in this guide. Chamaecyparis species are likewise not included.
Step two:
Carefully observe the symptoms on needles, branches, and trunks. Look for yellowing, bronzing, needle loss, dieback, bark cracks, cankers, and resin flows. Take note of which portions of the tree are affected, and whether it’s young or older foliage that’s showing symptoms. Look for nearby stumps. These may be indications of earlier problems on the site, and can be entry points for some pathogens. Look for obvious site problems like excess shade, excess water in the soil, and shallow soil. It’s a good idea to take photos of the plant(s) so you can use them to make decisions when going through the key.
Step three:
Follow this key to narrow down the list of possible causes for the symptoms and find out what steps to take. For each numbered set of choices, decide whether “a” or “b” best describes the situation, then follow the instructions to the next set of choices. Note that multiple pests and problems may occur on one plant.
START:
1a. Symptoms occurring on the main stem or branches, either alone or in combination with foliar symptoms > Go to 2.
1b. No symptoms on trunk or branches. > Go to 7.
2a. Holes in trunk > Go to 3.
2b. No holes in trunk > Go to 4.
3a. Horizontal row(s) of closely–spaced, round to oval holes > injury by sapsucker woodpeckers. Images are sufficient for clinic identification.
3b. Randomly scattered holes, with or without frass or sawdust coming out of them, or serpentine tracks under the bark > wood-boring insects. A physical sample or image of the insects and their galleries is needed; however these insects are most often secondary pests attracted to stressed or dying trees. Continue the guide at #4 if there are other symptoms.
4a. Swellings on main trunk or branches, beyond which the foliage is often yellow or brown > girdling. Go to 5.
4b. Cracking of bark, often with resin flow, but little or no swelling > Go to 6.
5a. Coil of silken thread embedded below or in the swelling > bagworm tie-offs (see also 16a).
5b. Wire, nylon rope, plastic tag, etc. embedded below the swelling > failure to remove tags or supports when no longer needed.
6a. Foliar symptoms present only beyond the visibly-affected area of the stem, and cambium tissue dead > canker. Submit the transition zone between living and dead wood as part of a complete sample.
6b. Foliar symptoms present on the entire tree > cracking and resin flow that can be non-diagnostic symptoms of stress. Go to 9.
FOLIAGE SYMPTOMS WITHOUT STEM SYMPTOMS
7a. Declining and color change (yellowing, browning) are occurring evenly, on most or all of the foliage on the tree. For purposes of this key, consider each stem of a multi-stemmed arborvitae as it’s own tree > Go to 8.
7b. Symptoms are not uniform, but rather are present on only parts of the tree or parts of individual branches > Go to 13.
8a. Most or all of plant yellow, brown, or wilting > Go to 9.
8b. Most or all of plant dull gray, rusty, greasy, or abnormally dull green > Go to 11.
9a. Evidence of chewing marks in the wood of the main stem under the soil line or litter layer, chewing marks and/or pruning of major roots, missing roots, trees loose in soil; only young trees affected > vole feeding injury.
9b. No evidence of feeding by rodents > Go to 10 (but see notes below 10b).
10a. Entire row of plants is affected simultaneously > likely a cultural or environmental problem (j-rooting, girdling or encircling roots, planting too deeply, transplant stress, drought stress, poor soil, excess water, normal cold-weather bronzing of Japanese cedar, etc.).
10b. Some plants in the row are affected (often one with severe symptoms) adjacent to trees with milder symptoms > likely Armillaria root rot or Phytophthora root rot, but could also be one of the problems mentioned above in 10a.
Note 1: When there’s only a single tree in the landscape, all of the above possibilities (10a and 10b) should be considered.
Note 2: Most of the scenarios above (10a and 10b) cannot be diagnosed visually (see Note 4 for an exception). A physical sample is needed, which must include roots and soil. Samples should be taken according to these instructions. If possible, some of the upper portion of the root system should be inspected to look for girdling roots or evidence of a prior pot-bound condition.
Note 3: A simple test for root rot is to pull on a section of root, to see whether the outer portion will easily separate from the inner vascular tissue. This indicates root rot.
Note 4: Armillaria root rot can sometimes be diagnosed in the field if the tree has declined to the point where destructive sampling is an option. Peel back the bark at the base of the main stem and from the largest roots, to look for a cream-colored mat of fungal mycelium.
11a. Pest signs (frass/fecal matter, wax, eggs, individuals) or symptoms (yellow stippling or patches on needles) visible with hand lens > Go to 12.
11b. No pest sign visible with hand lens > unknown. Contact clinic personnel for advice on how best to sample for potential pests or diseases.
12a. Minute, pale flecking on needles, small eggs or eggshells each topped with a tiny hair, mites and their shed skins may be visible > spruce spider mites. Light infestations are common and of no consequence to the plant.
12b. Small shell-like or “fried egg”-like structures that can be pried off the needles, exposing an insect beneath > scale insects, especially juniper scales, minute cypress scales (Carulaspis spp.), or Maskell scales (Lepidosaphes maskelli). Light infestations are common and of no consequence to the plant.
FOLIAGE UNEVENLY AFFECTED
13a. Twigs or needles malformed > Go to 14.
13b. Twigs and needles of normal size and shape > Go to 15.
14a. Ends of twigs slightly swollen, green at first, later opening and turning brown. > male or female cones (normal plant structures).
14b. Tips not cone-like, needles twisted or curved backwards, often turning pale yellow or brown, or with proliferation of shoots > herbicide injury.
15a. Host is Japanese cedar, and ends of twigs or sometimes sections of twigs below the tips are browning, with or without individual spots on needles > cause unknown but not likely an infectious disease as far as we can determine.
15b. Host is arborvitae or Leyland cypress > Go to 16.
16a. No pattern to damage; close examination shows tiny caterpillars in conical “bags” of plant tissue, feeding on needles > bagworms.
16b. Damage preferentially on either younger or older needles > Go to 17.
17a. Older needles changing color while newest growth looks good > Go to 18.
17b. Newest growth (needles or branch tips) turning orange, tan, or brown while the older foliage is less affected or unaffected > Go to 19.
18a. Older needles and/or twigs yellowing, browning, and dropping at multiple heights on the tree. Common on arborvitae in the fall but may also happen on Leyland cypress> internal browning (shading out) and normal fall shedding of older needles.
18b. Older needles turning brown individually or along sections of twigs, beginning in the lower portion of the tree and working outward and upward. Youngest needles not affected at first. From a distance, portions of the tree may look “burned”. Common on Leyland (and some other conifers like Eastern redcedar), but not on arborvitae. With a hand lens, tiny tufts of olive green spores may be visible > Passalora needle blight. (Mentioned in this bulletin from Clemson Cooperative Extension.)
19a. Tiny larvae (caterpillars) found boring within the dead portion of the twig tips, leaving holes and powdery fecal pellets (frass); arborvitae > arborvitae leafminer (Argyresthia).
19b. No signs of insect in twig tips. > Go to 20.
20a. Tips of scattered branches of Leyland cypress dying at any time of year, often slightly orange-colored, and with a sharp transition between the living and dead wood > Seiridium canker. (Mentioned in this bulletin from Clemson Cooperative Extension.)
20b. Needle death associated with cold, dry winds in the winter, possibly worse on the sunny side of the tree. Uncommon on conifers in North Carolina. > winter injury/desiccation. For more information see the Winter Burn article from Wisconsin Horticulture.